★OPVL
Origin1. Who created it? Dr. Marjorie Bloy
2. Who is the author? Robert Southey
3. When was it created? 1807
4. When was it published? 1807
5. Where was it published? England(U.K)
6. Who is publishing it? The website about the website which consisted about the child labour was published in 2008. And About the book was published at 1807.
7. Is there anything we know about the author that is pertinent to our evaluation? Yes, because he mentioned about him by using this expression, Mr…….. is “humane and kindly nature.”
2. Who is the author? Robert Southey
3. When was it created? 1807
4. When was it published? 1807
5. Where was it published? England(U.K)
6. Who is publishing it? The website about the website which consisted about the child labour was published in 2008. And About the book was published at 1807.
7. Is there anything we know about the author that is pertinent to our evaluation? Yes, because he mentioned about him by using this expression, Mr…….. is “humane and kindly nature.”
Purpose
1. Why does this document exist? This document is about the employment of children factories and concern among some elements of society.(primary source about child labor)
2.Why did the author create this piece of work? What is the intent? The author let the reader know about the reality during the industrial revolution.
3. Why did the author choose this particular format? By writing the reality related the industrial revolution, we could notice how cruel they were treated.
4. Who is the intended audience? Who was the author thinking would receive this? The author was thinking the owner would receive this. So, i think that's why he put reality cold.5. What does the document “say”? By relating to the industrial revolution, the author said about the labor that the children had to do at that time in London. So, we could notice how serious that was.
6. Can it tell you more than is on the surface?I don't think so.
2.Why did the author create this piece of work? What is the intent? The author let the reader know about the reality during the industrial revolution.
3. Why did the author choose this particular format? By writing the reality related the industrial revolution, we could notice how cruel they were treated.
4. Who is the intended audience? Who was the author thinking would receive this? The author was thinking the owner would receive this. So, i think that's why he put reality cold.5. What does the document “say”? By relating to the industrial revolution, the author said about the labor that the children had to do at that time in London. So, we could notice how serious that was.
6. Can it tell you more than is on the surface?I don't think so.
Value:
1. What can we tell about the author from the piece? He tried to use strong expression to let the reader feel anathema about the child labor just like he felt. I think he has prejudice.
2. What can we tell about the time period from the piece? It set as 19th century and the period was about industrial revolution’s time.
3. Under what circumstances was the piece created and how does the piece reflect those circumstances? The doctor Marjorie Bloy created the documentary. I could notice about the cruel the child labor related the industrial revolution.
4. What can we tell about any controversies from the piece? At first, Southey was going to refute with Manchester gentleman in the story. However. He didn’t.
5. Does the author represent a particular ‘side’ of a controversy or event?No, the author was going to mention about the side of a controversy, But, he refused.
6. What can we tell about the author’s perspectives from the piece? The author highly refuted about the main point of the documentary.
7. What was going on in history at the time the piece was created and how does this piece accurately reflect it? It reflected the period clearly, Because it’s about the employment of children in factories in industrial revolution period in England.
Limitation:
2. What can we tell about the time period from the piece? It set as 19th century and the period was about industrial revolution’s time.
3. Under what circumstances was the piece created and how does the piece reflect those circumstances? The doctor Marjorie Bloy created the documentary. I could notice about the cruel the child labor related the industrial revolution.
4. What can we tell about any controversies from the piece? At first, Southey was going to refute with Manchester gentleman in the story. However. He didn’t.
5. Does the author represent a particular ‘side’ of a controversy or event?No, the author was going to mention about the side of a controversy, But, he refused.
6. What can we tell about the author’s perspectives from the piece? The author highly refuted about the main point of the documentary.
7. What was going on in history at the time the piece was created and how does this piece accurately reflect it? It reflected the period clearly, Because it’s about the employment of children in factories in industrial revolution period in England.
Limitation:
1. What part of the story can we NOT tell from this document?
the author’s real opinion about the child labor.
2. How could we verify the content of the piece?
The setting of the documentary was set by the year of industrial revolution.
3. Does this piece inaccurately reflect anything about the time period?As I noticed, the documentary was set as the industrial revolution. Relating with that year, we could notice how the serious the child labor was.
4. What does the author leave out and why does he/she leave it out (if you know)?The author left the reality of that period. By industrial revolution, the technology aspects stand out
5. What is purposely not addressed?About the controversy.
★Reflection
the author’s real opinion about the child labor.
2. How could we verify the content of the piece?
The setting of the documentary was set by the year of industrial revolution.
3. Does this piece inaccurately reflect anything about the time period?As I noticed, the documentary was set as the industrial revolution. Relating with that year, we could notice how the serious the child labor was.
4. What does the author leave out and why does he/she leave it out (if you know)?The author left the reality of that period. By industrial revolution, the technology aspects stand out
5. What is purposely not addressed?About the controversy.
★Reflection
-Which main topic does the artifact relate to? In what ways?
About the reality during industrial revolution period. The author mentioned about the labour of child.
-which other main topics does it also relate to?
About the Luddites. (the background that the luddites could be organized.)
Why did you choose this artifact, and how much time did you spend creating and/or processing it?
This artifact acturally, this article appears the situation minutely with the conversation. I can't count how much time i spent for this artifact.
What insights and understanding have you gained from the creation and/or processing of this artifact?
About the reality of the industrial period.
Does this artifact reflect your best work and/or ideas? Why, or why not?
I tried my best. but i don't think it's all my ideas. it's based on the article. To consider the story of the reality was all i did about this article.
Rate this artifact on a scale of -5 to 5 (0 is neutral) for following 4 criterion:
a) impact on the equality of your portfolio - 5
b)Impact on your level of happiness/enjoyment - 5
c)Impact on your learning - 5
d)Level of creativity and originality - 4
Any additional comments.
I enjoyed to know about the reality while the industrial revolution was happening. Because, the industrial revolution is remembered as just nice aspects.
★Feedback/Comments
-★★★★★/★★★★/★★★/★★/★-
About the reality during industrial revolution period. The author mentioned about the labour of child.
-which other main topics does it also relate to?
About the Luddites. (the background that the luddites could be organized.)
Why did you choose this artifact, and how much time did you spend creating and/or processing it?
This artifact acturally, this article appears the situation minutely with the conversation. I can't count how much time i spent for this artifact.
What insights and understanding have you gained from the creation and/or processing of this artifact?
About the reality of the industrial period.
Does this artifact reflect your best work and/or ideas? Why, or why not?
I tried my best. but i don't think it's all my ideas. it's based on the article. To consider the story of the reality was all i did about this article.
Rate this artifact on a scale of -5 to 5 (0 is neutral) for following 4 criterion:
a) impact on the equality of your portfolio - 5
b)Impact on your level of happiness/enjoyment - 5
c)Impact on your learning - 5
d)Level of creativity and originality - 4
Any additional comments.
I enjoyed to know about the reality while the industrial revolution was happening. Because, the industrial revolution is remembered as just nice aspects.
★Feedback/Comments
-★★★★★/★★★★/★★★/★★/★-
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments can be vitamins to sunshine